Replay · corpus 2026-09-02 · prod-llm
Also in this edition
Times of Cent.Asiawritten for the evaluation, not a real publication
Eurasianetwritten for the evaluation, not a real publication
Same corpus, same date, different newspaper — the product’s whole claim, and the only place on the site you can check it without reading a number.
Signing in and receiving a feed built from your own words is not implemented here. Three things block it, all access rather than design — the honest version of “coming soon”.
01No browser may call the API
CORS middleware is added only when CORS_ORIGINS is set. It is unset; the documented default is “no web clients”.
02The sign-in token is the wrong audience
POST /auth/google verifies a token issued for the iOS client. A browser needs its own OAuth client for this origin.
03Feedback needs a delivery that happened
It must echo the feed_request_id, reader_generation and delivery_position of the edition shown. Those exist only on a live delivery, so the contract cannot be exercised against frozen fixtures without inventing identifiers.
Live end-to-end behaviour is therefore unverified. These fixture editions are not reader evidence: no sessions, no impressions, no feedback.